<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less is More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storageoptimization.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/less-in-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storageoptimization.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/less-in-more/</link>
	<description>Exploring Storage In an Online World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carter</title>
		<link>http://storageoptimization.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/less-in-more/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storageoptimization.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Yes, sifting data and getting files to the right tier of storage is key.  Archive may be one of those tiers.  But all the tiers will have file systems - whether they are internet services, archive products, or just low-cost storage tiers.
One of the most important things is how you get files to the right tier without disrupting users or applications.  A good approach for that is a file virtualization layer like F5&#039;s Acopia product.   But however you move files around, archive them, or optimize them (a la Ocarina) you still need a file system to store them on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sifting data and getting files to the right tier of storage is key.  Archive may be one of those tiers.  But all the tiers will have file systems &#8211; whether they are internet services, archive products, or just low-cost storage tiers.<br />
One of the most important things is how you get files to the right tier without disrupting users or applications.  A good approach for that is a file virtualization layer like F5&#8217;s Acopia product.   But however you move files around, archive them, or optimize them (a la Ocarina) you still need a file system to store them on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piyush</title>
		<link>http://storageoptimization.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/less-in-more/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Piyush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storageoptimization.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be best for enterprises to store their internet data on virtual storage devices and implement an archiving system to sift non-essential data. This will also help with making backups more efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be best for enterprises to store their internet data on virtual storage devices and implement an archiving system to sift non-essential data. This will also help with making backups more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
